News

Won’t permit ‘forum shopping’: SC to Karnataka hijab petitioners | India News


NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Monday condemned the “forum shopping tactic” used by a range of plaintiffs to ask for a hearing on the Karnataka government to be adjourned. Hijab is prohibited for Muslim women in educational institutions and remind them that cases have been listed at their request.
The petitioners, including students, challenged a Karnataka high court’s decision upholding the state’s decision to enforce the ban on Muslim female students wear a headscarf and have mentioned several times before about listing early for an urgent hearing on the matter, which they consider fundamental to their religious practices.
A bench headed by Justice Hemant Gupta, who is retiring on October 16, was upset when Mohd advocate Nizamuddin Pasha said a letter had been circulated requesting a six-day adjournment. weeks because it looks like there will be a hearing after Justice Gupta retires.
From Monday to October 16, Justice Gupta has more than six weeks in SC, and if one has a week-long Dussehra vacation, a six-week adjournment would take the case off the bench made by him. top.
“This type of forum shopping, we won’t allow it,” Justices Gupta and Sudhanshu Dhulia told Pasha sternly. “You’re constantly looking for an early hearing on appeals (against Karnataka’s HC verdict.) And when the petitions go to trial, you’re seeking adjournment,” said the bench. speak.
Attorney General Tushar Mehta said the plaintiffs’ attorneys mentioned six times before CJI about listing the lawsuits soon and, unfortunately, they are now asking for an adjournment. He said this is a purely legal question and the Karnataka government would rather argue it than submit an affidavit in response to appeals. SC has issued a notice to the Karnataka government regarding the petitions.
In response to Mehta, Pasha said that they sought an early hearing because hijab ban has made it difficult for Muslim schoolgirls to appear for the exams but as the issues are now listed for the final hearing, the attorney wants to be fully prepared with the case documents.
SG said more softly, “Does that mean when you searched for an expedited hearing, you did so without being prepared with the case files?” SC posted a hearing Monday rejecting the petitioners’ fervent pleas for a postponement of at least two weeks.
The divisive controversy, which erupted in the BJP-ruled southern state and spilled slightly into neighboring states ahead of council elections in five states, has left its mark on the model of appeals adopted. submitted to SC. If Niba Naaz, who wasn’t even a petitioner before the HC, was the first to win the race to file an appeal against the HC verdict, then Hindu Sena issued a warning in the SC to stop all attempts. force of any appellant to marry an ex. -parte stay on HC judgment.
On March 24, Aishat Shifa, the main petitioner before HC, applied for temporary relief on the grounds that exams were imminent.





Source link

news7f

News7F: Update the world's latest breaking news online of the day, breaking news, politics, society today, international mainstream news .Updated news 24/7: Entertainment, Sports...at the World everyday world. Hot news, images, video clips that are updated quickly and reliably

Related Articles

Back to top button