The NFL is spending too much money on its quarterbacks
In a way, the ever-changing landscape of the NFL is like fashion. It never stands still, always looking for new and creative ways to grow and eventually, it becomes a cycle. It’s all about trends for the time being. Concept running outside area. The lighter box to protect the running track. Versatile defensive midfielder. At some point, the bell will ring a new idea.
That theory also applies to NFL contracts, in terms of cost and how they are structured. As the league has grown commercially on a global scale, now hosting matches in four separate countries and opening the doors to new and exciting markets, the teams have reaped financial benefits. main. The NFL’s salary cap has increased at a steady rate of about seven percent annually, excluding the COVID-19-affected season in 2021, in which the figure fell by 8 percent, and the year recovered after the increase. 14 percent, essentially getting that lost year’s cash flow back and then some.
NFL the capitalization boom led to large QB deals
Predictably, the cap boom over the past few years has resulted in some big contracts. Most notably in the midfield position. Midfielders are always the most important player on the pitch – the game can live or die thanks to their ability to control the tempo, execute the plays and generally just do their job well. But as the NFL has transitioned over the past decade to a primarily pass-based league, teams are spending significantly more money on their signal callers.
There are currently 13 NFL starting quarterbacks earning more than $30 million a year for their respective teams, with Aaron Rodgers now earning an average of $50,271,667, the highest AAV in NFL history. On average, quarterbacks earning more than that $30 million threshold are taking up 20% of their team’s salary cap. Considering that an NFL roster includes 53 players, one player taking up that amount is surprising.
That’s the nature of the beast, though. The best quarterbacks in the NFL give a team a better chance of winning a championship, and they make the most money as a result. It is perfectly acceptable to pay the likes of Patrick Mahomes, Aaron Rodgers and Josh Allen such capital. But the current landscape has exploded and things are starting to get a little rough.
Is the Kyler Murray deal worth it?
Teams are hungry to start great quarterbacks in the NFL. So much so that they will do anything to get their guy. If that means giving the midfielder a little more to complete the deal, they will. Even if that guy isn’t necessarily the top player in the market. look no further the Arizona cardinals gave Kyler Murray a 5-year $230 million extension with $160 million in security.
At his best, Murray has proven himself to be a top 10 quarterback in the NFL and he’s still only 25. The Cardinals can buildand him in the next decade. Or can they? That’s the problem with playing. A double-edged sword that keeps teams up all night.
Giving Murray all that money to keep him is a good thing, but he is currently on 22.1% of the Cardinals cap. They are being plagued by their desperation right now. This is a new squad that won 4 games in 2022 and has plenty of holes across the board. The Cardinals are not a great team, but they have committed significant limits to one player. A player, like any other person, needs a supporting cast around him.
You can see where we’re going with this. Support actors cost money, and that money becomes increasingly difficult to distribute if it is tied to a single player. It’s not a new problem, though. This is the downside of Minnesota Vikings in the era of Kirk Cousins. The team was good enough to qualify for the knockout stages, but with Cousins - more specifically his contract – they struggled to put all the pieces together to really make a mark. real concave in the post-season.
Cousins, like Murray, is a good but not excellent midfielder. Really find myself right in the middle of the group when the talent goes, but like Murray, earns so much more. Sure, the market is finally catching up and Cousins’ contract doesn’t look as bad as it once did, but the damage is done already.
It also sets a precedent for the tournament. The intermediary contract no longer exists. A starting midfielder is either getting paid a rookie scale contract or he is making a lot of money. There are exceptions, but those contracts go to players like Mitchell Trubisky, Taylor Heinecke and Jacoby Brissett. Bridge starts with little upside down. They’re making that money because the teams don’t expect them to be starters for long.
However, teams are too scared to be in the midfield wilderness, and continuity is crucial. But at what cost? New York Giants just gave Daniel Jones four years, contract 160 million USD with $100 million bail. He’s currently one of the highest-paid quarterbacks in NFL history, despite placing 27th out of 35 quarterbacks in the EPA per play as of 2019, each RBSDM.
Like the Cardinals, the Giants are currently experiencing short-term difficulties. Giant wins nine game and its first post-season appearance since 2016 last year, but the roster isn’t talented enough to repeat that success, even with a few additions in the free agency. Paying Jones will complicate future lineups and he’s not good enough to carry an unusually attacking load like Patrick Mahomes.
Review Geno Smith
There must be a middle ground. Teams need to find a way to pay decent starting midfielders while giving themselves the flexibility to build a competitive squad. This freelance round taught us that it’s possible. On paper. The Seattle Seahawks and Las Vegas Raiders are providing parity in the midfield market by handing Geno Smith and Jimmy Garoppolo midfield contracts.
Seahawks and Smith agreed on a three-year, $75 million deal giving him $40 million in security, while the Raiders signed Garoppolo to a three-year $72.7 million deal with 45 million dollars in security. In terms of AAV, the two are at 15th and 16th respectively. If those arrangements work, they could provide a template for what could happen.
Those trades perfectly fit the criteria for what could create the trend of the midfield contract rising. The Seahawks can comfortably see themselves as true rivals in NFC with Smith, while the Raiders and Garoppolo may have a harder time performing post-season in a lauded AFC. However, these contracts give both teams flexibility. The Raiders still have the 11th most cap space in the NFL, and the Seahawks have the 17th most, each Spotrac. While that doesn’t mean they have to spend money right away, it also sets them up nicely for free agency next year. Both teams have the top 10 picks in the NFL Draft and have the opportunity to pick those who start making an impact from day one, or even a quarterback to sit and develop behind Smith or Garoppolo – but that is not necessary.
The main thing is that neither team has to give in and put themselves in an awkward position and both midfielders get paid. This is not to say that people like Joe Burrow or Justin Herbert shouldn’t make a fortune. When the likes of Jared Goff, Kirk Cousins or even Tua Tagovailoa hit the market soon, there may be a way to appease all parties.
After all, if you’re offering a midfield quarterback around $30 million a year instead of $45 million and promise that the extra money will be used to build a team that has a better chance of competing for Super Bowl, it can be a tough offer to refuse. Once the formula proves to be a success, it will become fashionable once again. Follow the trends.
NFL writer from Glasgow, Scotland. Follow me on Twitter @tvalentinesport and talk to Steely Dan with me.