NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Friday said Bombay HC’s order, which bans feral dogs in public places and requires people to adopt animals first, could ask for some amendments and agreed. heard a petition against this order.
HC has said that anyone who wants to keep a stray dog must first adopt a stray dog, bring it home, register it with the city government or put it in a dog shelter and then bathe it. his affection and love for it, by feeding and taking care of it. with all due respect.
Examining the HC order, a bench by Judges Sanjiv Khanna and JK Maheshwari said, “This order is an omnibus direction that may require some modifications. If wild dogs are not fed, they will become more aggressive. We need the support of the city company. At the same time, there must be an inspection”. The court ordered the petitioner to hand over a copy of the petition to the Nagpur City Corporation and Animal Welfare Department and post the case to 11/16.
Thinking that a recent HC order might have had the opposite effect of what was intended in controlling feral dog threats, animal welfare moved SC to challenge a bar set up by a gang. Bombay HC seat for volunteers feeding wild dogs on the streets of Nagpur. The HC Order would effectively “starve the wild dog population of Nagpur and make them more aggressive and aggressive as opposed to the actual purpose desired to be achieved by passing the order”, the special leave application bye bye Janice Smith of the Animal Welfare Fund.
HC has said that anyone who wants to keep a stray dog must first adopt a stray dog, bring it home, register it with the city government or put it in a dog shelter and then bathe it. his affection and love for it, by feeding and taking care of it. with all due respect.
Examining the HC order, a bench by Judges Sanjiv Khanna and JK Maheshwari said, “This order is an omnibus direction that may require some modifications. If wild dogs are not fed, they will become more aggressive. We need the support of the city company. At the same time, there must be an inspection”. The court ordered the petitioner to hand over a copy of the petition to the Nagpur City Corporation and Animal Welfare Department and post the case to 11/16.
Thinking that a recent HC order might have had the opposite effect of what was intended in controlling feral dog threats, animal welfare moved SC to challenge a bar set up by a gang. Bombay HC seat for volunteers feeding wild dogs on the streets of Nagpur. The HC Order would effectively “starve the wild dog population of Nagpur and make them more aggressive and aggressive as opposed to the actual purpose desired to be achieved by passing the order”, the special leave application bye bye Janice Smith of the Animal Welfare Fund.
