Sarver’s penalty draws criticism from across the league

NBA decided to penalize Suns Owner Robert Sarver 10 million dollars and suspend him for a year after that conclusion of the investigation his workplace misconduct “wasn’t for nothing”, but it also felt lighter than it should have been, The Athletic’s David Aldridge dispute.

Aldridge, The Athletic’s Sam Amickand NBC Sports’ Kurt Helin was one of a number of writers who expressed confusion over the investigation’s conclusion that it could not be determined whether Sarver’s comments and behavior were “fueled by hatred based on race or gender or are not”.

Sarver shouldn’t hide his excuses about his overly sublime sense of humor being misunderstood, Helin wrote, while Amick said the Suns owner was “often horrible” to women in addition to being “insensitive” about race and worst of all, outright racism.”

If the NBA wants to avoid the situation in Phoenix being repeated in another franchise, the league should establish more checks and balances in its relationship with its teams, Amick argued. Amick also believes the NBA needs to be held accountable for some of the “watchdog work” that the media has taken on in recent years in exposing some of the league’s most toxic workplaces in the past. Dallas and Phoenix.

Here are some other notes and reactions about the Sarver situation:

  • While Sarver should feel lucky to have kept possession of the Sun, resistance report with the idea that he deserves a $10 million fine and a one-year suspension as a sign that he hasn’t learned much from the process, says Chris Herring of Herring suggested that the federation should implement a zero-tolerance policy towards Sarver in the future to “further incentivize” him to legally change his behavior.
  • Several current and former Suns employees who spoke to ESPN’s Baxter Holmes since Tuesday were disappointed that Sarver would not face stiffer punishment, Holmes said during an appearance on NBA Today (video link). “I received a message recently from a current employee who said, ‘I can’t express to you how frantic and frustrated people are about the spineless nature of the decision. of the NBA,'” Holmes said.
  • While Sarver’s behavior could cost any ordinary employee a job, it is much easier to fire an employee than it is to take a business away from its owner, writes Michael Rosenberg of Rosenberg added: Attempting to squeeze Sarver out as owner of the Suns would mean a protracted legal battle for the NBA with a “chance of victory”.
  • If the NBA had tried to force Sarver out, his side would almost certainly respond with lawsuits, according to Vincent Goodwill of Yahoo Sportswho commented that the discovery process is something the league and the other 29 team owners might want to avoid.
  • Sarver will work with the NBA to appoint an interim governor who will oversee the Suns during Sarver’s one-year suspension, sources say Holmes (Twitter link).

Source link


News7F: Update the world's latest breaking news online of the day, breaking news, politics, society today, international mainstream news .Updated news 24/7: Entertainment, the World everyday world. Hot news, images, video clips that are updated quickly and reliably

Related Articles

Back to top button