Health

Prince Charles’ verdict is once again in doubt after a £1 million gift from bin Laden’s half-brothers


Prince Charles was embroiled in a new fundraising scandal last night after it was reported that his charity had received £1 million from the family of Osama Bin Laden.

The Prince of Wales Charity Foundation (PWCF) has secured a huge payment from Bakr and Shafiq Bin Laden, half-brothers of the mastermind of the 9/11 terrorist attacks, it is reported on last night.

The donation came after Charles held a private meeting with Bakr, 76, at Clarence House in 2013 – two years after Bin Laden was killed by US special forces.

Last night, Royal sources denied claims that Charles personally brokered the controversial deal or that he accepted the money despite objections from his advisers.

They also countered a report that one of his advisers had warned the crown prince that ‘it would not be good for anyone’ if it was reported that he had received money from the family of the founder of Al Qaeda.

But the revelation in The Sunday Times that the Prince’s charity has received money from the family of the man behind the worst terrorist attack in history raises further questions about his judgment. and the fundraising activities of his charities.

Nearly 3,000 people, including 67 Britons, were killed in the 9/11 attacks.

Charles, whose judgment is being made again, is pictured at the Sandringham Flower Show

Charles, whose judgment is being made again, is pictured at the Sandringham Flower Show

Charles, whose judgment is being made again, is pictured at the Sandringham Flower Show

It comes just weeks after it was reported that Charles had received more than £2.5 million in cash – some stuffed into the pocket of the Fortnum & Mason carrier and a suitcase – from a former Qatari prime minister.

Osama Bin Laden's half brother Bakr went to Clarence House for a meeting in 2013

Osama Bin Laden's half brother Bakr went to Clarence House for a meeting in 2013

Osama Bin Laden’s half brother Bakr went to Clarence House for a meeting in 2013

Bakr and Shafiq are related to Bin Laden through their billionaire father, Mohammed bin Awad Bin Laden, the founder of BinLadin Group, a large construction company in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Bin Laden is believed to have about 50 siblings and his family rejected him decades ago. There is no suggestion that Bakr or Shafiq financed or was involved in terrorism.

Bakr took over the family and its business in the late 1980s, but soon after the Saudi government expelled Bin Laden and stripped him of his citizenship following his criticism. for the royal family of Saudi Arabia.

Bakr then removed him as a shareholder in family companies and in 1991, Bin Laden went into exile, living in Sudan and later in Afghanistan, where he plotted the 9/11 attacks.

Prince Charles is said to have been introduced to Bakr in June 2001 by Prince Khalid Al-Faisal Al-Saud, a Saudi royal. Four months later, on 13 October 2001 – four weeks after the Twin Towers attack – the Prince of Wales dined with Bakr in Highgrove, his Gloucestershire hometown, to discuss the Muslim faith. Charles is a patron of the Oxford Center for Islamic Studies, where the Bin Laden family sponsors a scholarship program.

An official Court circular revealed the couple met again at Clarence House on October 30, 2013. The Sunday Times alleges Charles ‘brokered’ a £1 million payment following the meeting – a statement The claim is disputed by royal sources.

Al-Qaeda terrorist leader Osama Bin Laden was killed by US Navy SEALs in 2011

Al-Qaeda terrorist leader Osama Bin Laden was killed by US Navy SEALs in 2011

Al-Qaeda terrorist leader Osama Bin Laden was killed by US Navy SEALs in 2011

The report alleges that some of Charles’ advisers, including at least one trustee, personally pleaded with him to return the money, and warned that he would suffer serious reputational damage if involved. related to money from the Bin Laden family.

It was claimed they were ‘very warm’ to the Prince but were ‘screamed down’. These accounts were also disputed by people close to Charles.

A source is said to have said: ‘The fact that a top-level member of the British Foundation is choosing to broker deals with a name and a family not only raises alarm bells but causes alarm. worldwide horror…why are you doing this? I just don’t feel any member of the Royal Family should be involved in that kind of work. ‘

The Mail on Sunday understands that the State Department has been consulted about the PWCF’s receipt of money from the Bin Laden family and has approved.

Insiders say the five trustees of the charity thoroughly checked whether to accept the money and ultimately decided to do so on the grounds that Bin Laden’s terrible actions were not committed. His family was tarnished.

Insiders claim trustees have agreed that it will not tarnish the charity's name to receive Bakr cash

Insiders claim trustees have agreed that it will not tarnish the charity's name to receive Bakr cash

Insiders claim trustees have agreed that it will not tarnish the charity’s name to receive Bakr cash

Chairman Sir Ian Cheshire said the decision to accept the donation had been made by five commissioners.

At the time, they were Dame Amelia Fawcett, a financier who presided over Kew Gardens; Sir Michael Rake, former chairman of BT, John Varley, former Barclays chief executive William Nye, then chief private secretary to Charles and Kenneth Wilson, a scholar.

Sir Ian said: ‘The donation from Sheik Bakr Bin Laden in 2013 was carefully considered by the PWCF trustees at the time.

‘The due diligence process is already underway, with information sought from multiple sources, including the government. The decision to accept contributions is made entirely by the trustees. Any other attempt to suggest is misleading and inaccurate. ‘

A spokesman for Clarence House said: ‘The Prince of Wales Charitable Foundation [the PWCF’s trading name] assured us that due diligence was performed upon accepting this donation. The decision to accept is made solely by the trustees of the charity, and any attempt to describe it otherwise is false. ‘

Royal biographer Angela Levin last night warned that the revelations were a ‘serious’ blow to Charles, adding that Bin Laden remained a ‘really painful name to hear’.

She said: “It is a shame that there is another allegation against his judgment – that he made another false assessment.

‘It’s serious for him because there’s so much turmoil in the family at the moment, about people getting upset and making accusations.

Royal expert Angela Levin said the statements dealt a 'serious' blow to Charles (pictured yesterday)

Royal expert Angela Levin said the statements dealt a 'serious' blow to Charles (pictured yesterday)

Royal expert Angela Levin said the statements dealt a ‘serious’ blow to Charles (pictured yesterday)

‘Especially with the Queen at her age, he’s so close to taking over and becoming King. It leaves a stain. It’s not a case of just getting money, it’s clearly a case of thinking about the impression left. ‘

This payment represents the second fundraising scandal to hit Charles and PWCF in as many months.

Last month, it was reported that the Prince is said to have personally received £860,000 stuffed in a shipping bag from Fortnum & Mason department store from Sheikh Hamad bin Jassim bin Jaber Al Thani.

It was one of three cash payments, totaling £2.58 million, made between 2011 and 2015.

The Charity Commission denies investigating the donations and royal sources have insisted that such donations are not happening now.

In a separate controversy, The Mail on Sunday revealed last September that Charles’ closest confidant, Michael Fawcett, had offered to help a Saudi billionaire get his knighthood and British citizenship in exchange for cash donations.

The Charity Commission denies investigating the donations and royal sources have insisted that such donations are not happening now.  Pictured, Osama Bin Laden

The Charity Commission denies investigating the donations and royal sources have insisted that such donations are not happening now.  Pictured, Osama Bin Laden

The Charity Commission denies investigating the donations and royal sources have insisted that such donations are not happening now. Pictured, Osama Bin Laden

Clarence House said the Prince was ‘ignorant’ of the alleged cash-for-honor scandal.

The latest news will highlight those charged with advising Charles on sensitive financial matters. “His aides warned him about this and advised him that maybe he should take that £1m from someone else,” Ms Levin said.

‘He has to be extremely careful that he doesn’t put himself in a position where he is innocent but has a very negative impression.’

The Prince of Wales established a high profile in Saudi Arabia throughout the 1990s thanks to his prominent speeches in support of Islam.

The Bin Laden family was dubbed the Rockefellers of Saudi Arabia for their infrastructure projects and reaped huge fortunes thanks to their proximity to the Saudi royal family. On September 19, 2001, 13 members of the family left the United States with other Saudis.



Source link

news7f

News7F: Update the world's latest breaking news online of the day, breaking news, politics, society today, international mainstream news .Updated news 24/7: Entertainment, Sports...at the World everyday world. Hot news, images, video clips that are updated quickly and reliably

Related Articles

Back to top button