Horse Racing

NY Bypass Suspension Restrictions, Target Mutuel Ignore Married Jockeys


Via

Without any public discussion among the commissioners and expedited by unanimous vote, the New York State Gaming Commission (NYSGC) on Monday issued a new rule designed to to keep horse racing players from stalling through filing an appeal to get out of suspension from riding in the lucrative Saratoga Race Meet Course.

In a similarly swift fashion, the NYSGC also began kicking off on February 28 the work of a proposed regulation to lift controversial pari-mutuel restrictions regarding married racers. compete in the same race. This measure must be returned for a final vote after publication in the state registers and perhaps the final round of public comment.

It’s been 14 months since newlyweds Katie Davis and Trevor McCarthy made unwanted headlines when an old NYSGC rule required married racehorses to be treated as a hobby. forcing the puzzling pari-mutuel pairs in 41 races where they compete against one another.

From January 1 to March 21, 2021, McCarthy and Davis’ mounts in joint races at the Aqueduct caused an estimated $4.2 million in handle damage.

The regulation in question, rule 4025.10(f), states, “All horses trained or ridden by a jockey’s spouse, parent, issuer or family member shall be married suitable for betting on any horse that is ridden by that jockey.”

The adoption of that little-used rule has been derided by the betting public and has been called sexist by some critics. But the NYSGC did not address the controversy in any public, public meeting in 2021 while a piece of legislation to update the regulation passed unanimously through both Congress and the Senate.

But on October 25, that bill was surprisingly vetoed by New York Governor Kathy Hochul, who explained that she would instead direct the NYSGC to consider “the continued need for forced coupling” and circumstances in which such a requirement may be relaxed”.

That directive led to a heated commentary seeking comment from Pure industry stakeholders, regulators and watchdogs, of which not a single one advocated keeping the old rule in place. crap as written.

Second, the last issue was brought up before the NYSGC kicked off the old regulatory change process by simply removing the word “will” from rule 4025.10(f) and replacing it with the phrase “optional.” paired.

The ‘Saratoga’ rule has changed

The so-called “Saratoga rule” stems from an initiative from June 2021 in which the NYSGC seeks to end the resource-consuming practice of carriage riders soliciting equestrian violations during a big money race meeting like at Saratoga, then withdraw those protests after the meeting. for the sole purpose of delaying suspension until the fined rider can serve the day more conveniently.

Recording the results gives the committee the power to decide instead to get the rider suspended at the next meeting on the same track, meaning the rider’s Saratoga penalty may not be pushed back. such as the Aqueduct in winter, if managers have chosen to move the date to the start of next year’s meeting at Spa.

The bill voted on Monday reads: “If a jockey is guilty of an equestrian offense and a suspension or annulment is not served at the same race meeting, the commission by decision Its discretion may dictate that the penalty be taken, in whole or in part, at the next race meeting on the same track.”

According to a brief statement by NYSGC advisor Edmund Burns, only one organization, the Jockeys’ Guild, has filed a public comment on the proposed rule change. Burns summed up the opposition thus:

“Jockeys’ Guild opposes codifying this policy as a regulation. Instead, the Jockeys’ Guild suggests that hearing malicious claims will be subject to sanctions if the appeal is made frivolously.

The Jockeys’ Association also suggests that the regulation allows jockeys suspended for a minor riding offense of 10 days or less to participate in ‘designated races’ during the suspension period. only, will then be suspended for one day to make up for the specified race day. Jockey’s Guild suggests that such a policy could reduce the number of horse racing challenges.

“Instead, the Jockeys’ Guild stated that if the rule were passed, the rule would retain the provision allowing full discretion to decide whether a penalty should be taken on the same track.”

NYSGC staff responded in writing to the Guild’s proposals. But the response was completely redacted from Burns’ abstract, so it cannot be published here.

Other suggested rules

Also moving toward publication in the state register and required public comment intervals on Monday are:

a.) An amendment to the regulation governing the licensing of bicycle racing dealers removes the requirement that the applicant be previously licensed as a gymnast, trainee athlete, athlete equestrian, assistant coach or trainer for at least one year. The proposed change would instead allow administrators to determine if an applicant is eligible. TDN First time reporting on this seemingly limited practice back in 2020.

b.) Amendments to the horse racing equipment weighing rules will remove the need to balance snout, martingales and breastplate racehorses, as in Florida, Kentucky, California and other states.





Source link

news7f

News7F: Update the world's latest breaking news online of the day, breaking news, politics, society today, international mainstream news .Updated news 24/7: Entertainment, Sports...at the World everyday world. Hot news, images, video clips that are updated quickly and reliably

Related Articles

Back to top button