News

Northeast Diary: Why these states kept outside delimitation purview | India News


banner img

Article 82 of the Constitution of India provides that after each census, a demarcation must be made to redraw the boundaries of the council and Lok Sabha constituencies. For this, Congress should enact a The Act of Separation Every 10 years, a committee is formed to conduct the exercise.
But this has not been the case in the case of the four northeastern states – Assam, Arunachal Pradesh, Manipur and Nagaland – over the past five decades, accusing the North-Eastern Needs Delimitation Commission (DDC-NE) and groups other from the region.
Existing constituencies are demarcated under the provisions of the Delimitation Act, 2002 taking into account 2001 census figures, with the exception of four NE states, which have seen this maneuver. the last time in the 1970s.
In addition, the Constitution was specifically amended in 2002 so that there is no delineation of constituencies until the first census after 2026. Therefore, the current constituencies are The engraving on the basis of the 2001 census will continue to operate until the first census after 2026, according to an explainer released by the Election Commission of India.
The matter lies in Section 8A of the Representation of the People (Amendment) Act 1956, which states, “If the President is satisfied that the situation and conditions prevailing in the States of Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Manipur or Nagaland in favor of delimitation enforcement, that State may, upon order, rescind a moratorium issued pursuant to section 10A of the Delimitation Act 2002 (33 2002) relating to National that State, and to regulate the enforcement of the delimitation in that State. by the Election Commission. ”
DDC-NE and other organizations, which recently organized a protest at the Jantar Mantar in Delhi demanding demarcation of boundaries in four states, argued that the issue of law and order was just an excuse because states and national elections are being held across the region.
Addressing the protesters, Habung Payeng, former information commissioner in Arunachal Pradesh claimed the Center had violated Articles 14 (Equal Rights) and 21 (Rights to Life and Freedom) of the Indian Constitution by delaying postpone the exercise.
“The Center and ECI cited the law and order situation as an excuse to delay the delimitation. If there is a problem of law and order in these four northeastern states, why are they holding elections? This is just hypocrisy,” Payeng said, adding that the NE groups are just demanding their “constitutional rights.”
Lorho S. Pfoze, Lok Sabha MP of Manipur and associate member of the Delimitation Committee, has said that it is necessary to “reorganize” the borders of Assam, Arunachal Pradesh, Nagaland and Manipur, adding, China The mind gave “very little importance” to the discernment exercise there.
“Sadly, after all these years, we still find ourselves in a situation where people still have to fight for their basic rights. They (Center) invoke the law and the orderly situation to not dictate the demarcation, but the truth is, the Center has very little importance to the northeastern states,” Pfoze alleges.
A case pending in the Supreme Court, on 25 July sought a response from the Department of Home Affairs, the Department of Law and Justice, the Chief Election Commissioner and others on the matter.

FOLLOW US ON SOCIAL MEDIA

FacebookTwitterInstagramKOOKS APPLICATIONYOUTUBE





Source link

news7f

News7F: Update the world's latest breaking news online of the day, breaking news, politics, society today, international mainstream news .Updated news 24/7: Entertainment, Sports...at the World everyday world. Hot news, images, video clips that are updated quickly and reliably

Related Articles

Back to top button