News

Linguistic, religious minority status to be decided state-wise: SC | India News


NEW DELHI: Supreme Court on Monday said it was a steady position that a community’s linguistic and religious minority status would be determined state-by-state based on the state’s population and that it would be a betrayal. justice if, for example, Christians are the majority in Mizoram. and Nagaland is given minority status or Sikhs are treated as a minority in the Punjab.
When hearing a PIL seeking to declare Hindus a minority in states where it outnumbers others, a panel of Judges UU Lalit, S Ravindra Bhat and Sudhanshu Dhulia said know any such community which may be a religious or linguistic minority. It said Marathi speakers would be a minority outside Maharashtra; Kannada speakers in Maharashtra is a minority.
The petitioner said Hindus are a minority in J&K, Mizoram, Nagaland, Meghalaya, Arunachal, Lakshadweep, Manipur and Punjab but the Center has so far only claimed to be Muslim, Christian, Parsis, Sikh, Buddhism and Jains are ethnic minorities in the country.
The Supreme Court said it could not consider the issue of minority status for Hindus in some states “out of the air” and asked the petitioner to give specific examples that Hindus were deny the benefits of minority status in states where their populations are smaller than in other communities. .
The petitioner mentioned several states where the population of Hindus is less than other communities and pleads that they be treated as a minority under the Posts 29-30 to establish and manage educational institutions of their choice. Hindus make up 1% of the population in Ladakh, 2.8% in Mizoram, 2.8% in Lakshadweep, 4% in Kashmir, 8.7% in Nagaland, 11.5% in Meghalaya, 29% in Arunachal Pradesh , 38.5% in Punjab and 41.3% in Manipur .
At the beginning of the hearing, Judges UU Lalit, S Ravindra Bhat and Sudhanshu Dhulia indicated whether the government needs to give some notice to issue a minority card to a community. The council also gave the example of DAV running educational institutions across the country but said all of their institutions will not receive minority cards and it must be decided at the state level and in consultation. SC’s ruling in the TMA Pai case in 2002.
“A Sikh institution in Punjab receiving minority status is a betrayal of justice. The Christian majority in Nagaland and Mizoram cannot be considered a minority in those states,” he said. directed the observation while emphasizing that the exercise to decide minority status was decided through the state and not on a national scale. Senior advocate Arvind Datar, appearing for the petitioner, sought two weeks’ time to give examples where Hindus were denied the benefits of minority status.





Source link

news7f

News7F: Update the world's latest breaking news online of the day, breaking news, politics, society today, international mainstream news .Updated news 24/7: Entertainment, Sports...at the World everyday world. Hot news, images, video clips that are updated quickly and reliably

Related Articles

Back to top button