The Supreme Court said Ganesh Chaturthi celebrations on Eidgah Stadium in Karnataka could go ahead as planned, the Supreme Court said, rejecting the petition after the Supreme Court ordered a freeze in the school. union Bengaluru Eidgah Maidan.
Here are the top 10 points in this big story:
-
In a midnight hearing, the High Court said the “serious dispute” over ownership in the Bengaluru Eidgah land case did not exist in the Hubballi case. Therefore, the Supreme Court’s order does not apply, Justice Ashok S Kinagi said.
-
“This (Hubballi’s base) is the property of the corporation and the company can do whatever it deems fit… They have two days of prayer, Ramzan and Bakri Id, which of course cannot be denied. intervene,” the judge said.
-
The decision to hold the Ganesh Chaturthi celebration on the Eidgah field in Hubballi was made by the local citizenship agency earlier on Tuesday.
-
The Supreme Court complaint was filed by Anjuman-e-Islam after the Supreme Court ordered the status quo to be preserved in the case of holding the proposed celebration on Eidgah land in Bengaluru, more than 400 km away. .
-
The government’s order to allow Ganesh Chaturthi ceremonies in Bengaluru’s Eidgah Maidan was challenged by the Waqf Council in the High Court.
-
Arranging a status quo, the bench of Justices Indira Banerjee, AS Oka and MM Sundresh said Ganesh puja could be held elsewhere.
-
The Supreme Court will hear the ownership of the 2.5-acre property, Bench also said.
-
During lengthy arguments in the highest court, the Waqf council argued that no religious events from any other community should be held on the property as it was declared a Waqf Property. “Suddenly in 2022, they said it was disputed land, and they wanted to celebrate Ganesh Chaturthi here,” it said.
-
When the court asked the state attorney, Mukul Rohatgi, if there were any previous cases of such events at the Eidgah Maidan, he said, “It cannot be grounds to object to an event now hours.”
-
“I wonder if there are any temples in this country where minorities are allowed in to pray,” said Dushyant Dave, who represents the Waqf Board. The council also cited the case of Babri Masjid in Ayodhya, saying, “Then the UP minister also gave a guarantee, in the case of Babri Masjid…. You know what happened there”.
