Tech

DreamUp AI Art Generator illustrates the collision between art consent and AI dataset


DreamUp sample image

I entered the prompt to create these images.

DreamUp

Behind artificial intelligence art is data — countless images are used to train an AI art generator. As the user enters the prompt, the generator separates those pre-existing images to create new color and shape combinations, a controversial new work of art.

AI art creators derive information from what they are exposed to, as do human artists. But there is a difference in scale in how humans take input, process it, and try to create something new when compared to AI.

When DeviantArt released its AI art creator, DreamUp, There was immediate backlash from its community on community artwork automatically opted in for use in the AI ​​dataset.

Creators will have to manually opt out to protect their work from future AI image training. However, the opt-out request will only take effect after their work has presumably been used to train DreamUp in some capacity.

Also: How to use DALL•E 2 to turn your wildest imaginations into tangible art

DreamUp is an AI art generator that generates prompt-based art, rooted in stable diffusion. Its ability to create art is based on content taken from the web without notice or permission of the artists who created the work. One artist on Twitter summed up the process well:

Content pulled from DeviantArt and other sources will be fed into the LAION dataset, which is then processed through machine learning, ultimately creating a 3D model. The opt-out occurs before more machine learning, but does not apply to the initial training.

DeviantArt addresses concerns in an update say:

  • They will not use artwork submitted to the DeviantArt community on DreamUp or other AI training sets or models.
  • They do not consent to third parties taking images from the site.
  • To help prevent future unauthorized use of artwork in training AI models, they will be implementing “no” flags to let the AI ​​models know that the artist does not want their work to be seen. use. This won’t guarantee that the artist’s wishes are respected, but it’s a start.

I tested DreamUp after seeing that DeviantArt solved the problems the artists presented. I had to sign up to use it, and I got five free usage reminders. In the Guidelines Reminder it says: “Images inspired by other artists the artist must be clearly mentioned at the time of publication.

Also: The people who build artificial intelligence are the ones who need AI the most

My image was inspired by a dream I had (thanks, subconsciously) and my reminder was, “A car in the shape of a shoe is driving down the highway.” Here are three images DreamUp gave me in less than a minute:

DreamUp car pictures

DreamUp

Hmmm, I’m picturing another shape, but I don’t mind the picture below.

DreamUp car pictures

DreamUp

I don’t feel comfortable giving credit to these images, as I don’t think I was involved enough in their creation, so I’ll credit their creators themselves.

I also tried another prompt, “space rocket ship couple” and got these three new images:

DreamUp couple in rocket ship image

DreamUp

My favorite of the three is comic one:

DreamUp rocket image

DreamUp

Finally, I tried the suggestion with my brother’s favorite item, “Galactic dragon Stephen Curry”. His favorite of the three is this, even though Steph Curry’s number is 30 and I’m sure he doesn’t play for Goory Boxty Terrors?

DreamUp Steph curry images

DreamUp

These images aren’t cohesive and have a patchy, melting quality to them. Still, it’s fun to experiment with DreamUp. I see it as an inspiration for art rather than an alternative.

The fact that you can easily type something into the generator and create images has led to art communities flooded with AI-generated images.

Some communities completely banned the art of AI. This leads to a broader debate about what gives the art value and how AI fits into the puzzle.

Also: The real goal of AI may no longer be intelligence

If it matters that countless data points of artwork are used to train the AI ​​to create artwork in less than a minute, the art of winning contests no less?

The sheer amount of art you can create with AI eclipses the sheer number of man-made works of art that require hours of thought and labor. I think this could lead to a few outcomes:

  1. AI art is being used more for inspiration than the final output in the human creative process.
  2. Art enthusiasts favor “handmade” human works over AI-generated assembly line pieces.
  3. Other creative industries, like music and writing, eventually developed their own versions of generators.

The The potential with AI art generators is hugeand so are the possible consequences.

news7f

News7F: Update the world's latest breaking news online of the day, breaking news, politics, society today, international mainstream news .Updated news 24/7: Entertainment, Sports...at the World everyday world. Hot news, images, video clips that are updated quickly and reliably

Related Articles

Back to top button