By Meta The disaster is far from over. Karl Racine, Attorney General of the District of Columbia, sued Mark Zuckerberg. He accused The CEO who directly makes the decisions that lead to the big data breach.
Racine claimed that Zuckerberg “contributed to Facebook’s lax monitoring of user data and misleading privacy arrangements.” That, according to allow consulting firm Cambridge Analytica to acquire , including more than 340,000 DC residents. The company allegedly used the data to help engage voters in the 2016 presidential election through political ad targeting.
Former AG (then known as Facebook) about the 2018 scandal. That case is still ongoing. This time, Racine is aiming directly at Zuckerberg. Under the jurisdiction’s Consumer Protection Procedures Act, which prohibits unfair and deceptive trade practices, individuals are held legally responsible for the actions of companies they have engaged in. know, control or not prevent.
Racine is seeking a jury trial against Zuckerberg. He wants the CEO of Meta to avoid future CPPA violations and to pay civil damages and penalties. Engadget has reached out to Meta for comment.
“Since filing the landmark Facebook lawsuit, my office has fought very hard against the company’s signature efforts to combat the production of documents and obstruct our lawsuit. . We continue to persevere and have followed the evidence of Mr. Zuckerberg’s rights”, Racine . “This unprecedented security breach exposed tens of millions of Americans’ personal information, and Zuckerberg’s policies facilitated a multi-year effort to mislead users about the extent of misconduct. of Facebook. This lawsuit is not only warranted but necessary, and sends the message that company leaders, including CEOs, will be held accountable for their actions.”
All products recommended by Engadget are handpicked by our editorial team, independent of our parent company. Some of our stories include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, we may earn an affiliate commission.