Auto Express

Citroen C4 vs Kia XCeed: Dual Test Review of 2022

The new car market is filled with different niches, but Citroen C4 and Kia XCeed We are testing here managed to sit in one of the most specific categories.

They are quite close to a family about the size of the hatchback, but both have raised ride height and luxurious SUV-style panels. So, for example, if you find a Volkswagen Golf Course a bit too reasonable for your taste, but don’t need a car this size Tiguanthen these models can be the ideal replacement.

Both cars tested here have the most powerful engine options in their respective models, and they’re well equipped. Then here are the powerful, luxurious hatchbacks that claim them SUVs, but take comfort in a long ride as they can get around town. But which one is the best?

Citroen C4


Citroen C4 Puretech 155 Shine Plus




1.2 liter 3-round turbocharger


8.5 seconds

Check out the economy:

45.8mpg / 10.1mpl



Annual road tax:


While the C4 sits in its own niche in terms of styling, it also stands out for details you can’t see. In addition to the petrol model we’re testing here, you can also opt for all-electric and diesel powertrains.

Then there’s the mechanical layout. When Citroen Having long since abandoned the complicated air suspension, the brand has switched to a simpler setup that they hope will give the C4 a very distinctive feel. We’re testing the top-spec Shine Plus model here with a recent addition to the engine range – PureTech 155 petrol. This costs £28,490 before option.

Design & Engineering

After a long period in which Citroen seemed to lose its identity, recent models have begun to capture some of the qualities that make its classic models so desirable. That can be clearly seen just by looking at the C4, whose quirky design ensures it stands out on the road not only alongside the XCeed but also from most other hatchbacks.

Elements like the ‘airbump’ plastic backplate that protects against scratches demonstrate that some sensible steps were sought, but true to the traditional Citroen oddity, not all design decisions seem to be. are made with absolute realism. Take back that bluff ending; The square shape for the bootlid has been adorned with a subtle spoiler, located just above the rear window glass, partially obscuring the driver’s rear view. Inside, the C4’s cabin doesn’t quite match the distinctive exterior.

Our test car’s all-black scheme didn’t help, but the overall layout is fairly conventional. It looks more modern ThatIt’s a dash, though, and there’s not much in there in terms of build quality. A three-tier block at the bottom of the panel houses a wireless smartphone charging dock upstairs, while underneath there’s a small hidden space beneath the hinged middle shelf. Useful communications are limited to the iPad holder on the passenger side of the console; The frame keeps the unit safe in use, and it stowed away neatly in the control panel drawer when not needed.

One quality that Citroen has chosen to try to reconnect with older models is comfort. To that end, the C4 has a specially padded seat that uses several different foam materials in the cushion to provide maximum comfort for a variety of body types. They feel very soft, although the backrest and base are wide, fairly flat, and don’t offer too much lateral support when cornering.

That softness also extends to the C4’s driving comfort. Here, Citroen installed hydraulic stoppers across the entire suspension, allowing for softer springs and dampers while also preventing the car from plunging downwards. It also really works; has a comfortable gait when installing the suspension – which excludes other Citroen models – quite unlike anything else at this price point. The setup is best on A-roads, where a steady ride brings out the best of that softness. That, on the other hand, means that during acceleration and hard braking, the body of the car rolls back and forth on its springs, and at higher speeds the Kia’s slightly firmer setup means the car will Feel safer.


At 1,299kg, the C4 is 100kg lighter than the XCeed. That leads to vibrant performance. The three-cylinder engine is quieter than the XCeed’s four-cylinder, although its rival transmits less vibration through the cabin.

While the eight-speed automatic is perfectly smooth, it’s clumsy in traffic, making it nearly impossible for the C4 to gently stop. The steering wheel allows manual control for more spirited driving.


The knee room at C4 is very spacious, with a light roof and large sunroof creating a sense of ventilation. The additional rear glass provides over-the-shoulder visibility, so its blind spot is smaller than the Kia’s.

With a capacity of 380 liters, the trunk of the C4 is quite large. There’s not much wheel penetration into space, and the side-loading medium means it’s fairly easy to transport bulky items inside. While the rear rest lacks the XCeed’s three-way split, the Citroen has a ski hatch. Isofix child seat mounts are hidden behind zippered covers; Kia has removable plastic caps, making it easier to connect the fixings.


While Citroen dealers were not included in our 2021 Driver Power survey, Kia once again excelled with a network that ranked 3rd out of 21 brands. The sales team and the mechanic’s working standard both receive praise.

There is little to separate the two when it comes to insurance; Our representative annual quote returned figures of £385 for the Citroen and £399 for the Kia.

Operating costs

The C4’s lower kerbweight also helps reduce operating costs. Our 45.8mpg seemed fairly easily achievable in a variety of conditions, and at 133g/km, CO2 emissions are 10g/km lower than the XCeed.

Neither car offers strong aftertaste, but the Citroen is the better of the two. After three years, it still retains 43.7% of its original value, which compares well with Kia, which holds 40.7%.

Kia XCeed


XCeed 1.5 T-GDi 4




1.5 liter 4-round turbocharger


8.7 seconds

Check out the economy:

42.9mpg / 9.4mpl



Annual road tax:


The Cee’d name was introduced in 2006 with the Mk1 family hatchback, initially positioned as a rival to the VW Golf. Two generations later – and minus the apostrophe – the Ceed is now more than capable of matching the best in its class and has four styles to choose from: five-door Proceed, estate, emergency brake and XCeed This SUV-inspired is now available.

Until recently, Kia offered a dual-clutch XCeed automatic. While this would be perfect compared to the C4, Kia has stated that the combination of “unprecedented demand” and “new supply challenges” means it is not currently on offer, as so we’re testing a manual XCeed here.

Design & Engineering

Of the four models that make up the broader Ceed family, the XCeed has the most distinctive look. Indeed, the front door is the only exterior panel shared with the rest of the lineup, while the car’s overall shape and details, such as the head and taillights, are completely different from the name. its.

As with the C4, this includes a slightly raised stance to bring out the crossover flavor, but the XCeed’s shape is softer and less challenging than its rival, and that will likely help it. favored by many buyers.

Internally, the panel layout closely resembles the rest of the Ceed range. While there aren’t many build-quality flaws, the general layout is starting to look a bit dated. Like Citroen, Kia has equipped the XCeed with a smartphone holder with wireless charging. There’s also a pair of cup holders in the front (not as deep as the C4) and a giant cubicle enclosed bin between the front seats. While the French car’s glovebox is tiny – a result of placing the fuse box in the same area – Ceed’s is generous, as are its door boxes.

One downside is visibility, as the car’s large C-pillar means there’s a big blind spot; The C4 has slim rear lights, which helps.

One area where the XCeed is ahead of the competition is in infotainment technology. Kia hasn’t done anything radical here – and that’s a good thing. You get a large, clear display, a main menu page with two rows of icons, a streamlined submenu structure, and decent load times. While Kia’s old setups had physical shortcut buttons, they’ve now been replaced by a row of touch-sensitive keys, which are still large enough to be fairly easy to use.

The functions of the digital dials are found on the steering wheel and again, their layout is easy to figure out. They offer a lot more customization than the small and pretty basic digital array in C4. Overall, the system works a lot more friendly than the confusing interface of the opponent.

While mechanically similar to the Ceed hatchback, the XCeed is positioned higher, thanks to a 20mm increase in ride height, plus slightly thicker tires. This doesn’t dramatically change the way it performs, but it does mean that, in this company, the XCeed is a much more appealing option to drive. While the slightly stiffer (but not obtrusive) suspension for better body control certainly plays a part in this, it’s the steering that really makes the difference. In the event that the C4’s stand is inconspicuous and too light, the Ceed’s stand is very precise and it loads up spontaneously when turning a corner.


Kia’s 1.5-litre petrol engine boosts 5hp and 13Nm on the Citroen’s 1.2, but on paper it takes an extra 0.2 seconds to get from 0-62mph. The XCeed’s power delivery feels more linear than the C4, whose peak torque comes in suddenly.

Shifting the six-speed manual through the gate is good enough, but the clutch pedal is light and the bite point isn’t obvious, so it’s difficult to move away cleanly. The start-stop system works much more smoothly than the C4.


The XCeed’s 426-liter trunk volume is double the C4’s 380-liter capacity, and the space increases to 1,378 liters when the seat is lowered. The highest spec model 4 has the ability to fold in a 40:20:40 ratio, the lower model 3 has a less flexible 60:40 split.

At the back, the Kia isn’t quite as spacious as the C4 when it comes to knee space, but those sitting higher will find a bit more headroom. The hump in the center of the floor is much smaller than that of the Citroen, but there’s not much leg room under the front seats. A panoramic sunroof is standard on all 4 versions. While it lets in plenty of light, it only opens halfway – although the same is true of the C4’s roof.


For peace of mind, Kia’s seven-year/100,000-mile warranty should be a big draw for buyers – and will also make the car even more appealing to used buyers. Citroen’s coverage is less comprehensive, at three years or 60,000 miles, whichever comes first.

Kia took the excellent second place in the Driver Power manufacturer category for 2021. In contrast, the Citroen ranked 28th out of a poor 29.

Operating costs

Both cars hit mid-forties mpg, but the Citroen’s 45.8mpg figure gives it a 2.9mpg advantage over the Kia. This means a saving of £214 over 20,000 miles, based on a gas price of £1.59 per litre.

The Kia’s CO2 emissions are slightly higher than the Citroen’s. It is therefore more than a tax, which for drivers of company cars on a lower tax means an annual deduction of £3,802 – £191 more than the C4.


First location: Kia XCeed

While both cars operate in a niche, they each have their own distinct appeal. Still, Kia wins because the trim we have is much cheaper than the Citroen, and the XCeed is likely to be a more satisfied owner potential, with great tech, a big boot and a drive good disc.

Second place: Citroen C4

The C4 has helped Citroen rediscover some of its quirks, and for some, that will be reason enough to buy. It’s comfortable, spacious, and a bit cheaper than the Kia. However, this is not the trim or the engine that we chose; The C4’s appeal lies in the more affordable end of the range.

Source link


News7F: Update the world's latest breaking news online of the day, breaking news, politics, society today, international mainstream news .Updated news 24/7: Entertainment, the World everyday world. Hot news, images, video clips that are updated quickly and reliably

Related Articles

Back to top button