Christina Haack slanders Ant Anstead for sharing article about custody battle – Hollywood Life
Christina Haack had a big problem with a Today’s Psychology Article regarding her custody battle with ex-husband Ant Anstead. The reality star, 39, wrote a lengthy reply to the piece about her Instagram, which called for more child protection on social media and reality TV, but she also urged her ex, 43, to also share the article, except Ant felt the article was much more positive. . “I just noticed Hudson’s dad promoting this article on his site, but clap your hands,” she wrote in caption. “This makes this even more weird and unsettling.”
When Ant shared the article, he praised the journalist Hilary Levey Friedman Ph.D. including his custody battle and highlighting issues that For the love of cars The owner took a picture with his ex-wife with their son Hudson, 3, in paid commercials, and he supports the idea of ”Hudson’s Law” to help protect children on social media and reality TV. “What an absolutely brilliant article by [Hilary Levey Friedman] calls for an urgent change in the law to protect our children,” he wrote on Instagram Story.
While Ant supported the opinions expressed by the sociologist and author, Christina was upset and called the article “completely inaccurate”. She argued that she was not trying to make the case that she and her son Ant should be included in her paid TV shows or commercials. “I never fought to have Hudson star in a movie with me or do commercials. I made my point that a public figure with a public Instagram should take his own advice and keep Hudson out of all media if he is concerned about Hudson’s safety and well-being.” she wrote.
Besides refuting the claims in the article, Christina also pointed out other reality shows like Toddler and Crown as well as influencers including their children in paid promotional posts. “Are all these people putting their children in harm’s way [sic] or use their children as ‘puppets?!’ The answer is NO,” she replied, pointing out that most of her shows aren’t focused on her kids, but on home improvements.
Christina eventually endorsed the idea of ”Hudson’s Law,” saying it made no sense. “Put me out of your propaganda. Hudson’s Law?! Really? That is illogical. You know nothing about my household. Hudson is MY son. I have always defended him and always will,” she wrote earlier in her caption.
The couple has previously participated in a Child custody battle regarding their son since April when Ant full payment of guardianship. Christina responded to a request from her ex that she was “Exploiting” their son in a court filing in September. She says that although Hudson has appeared in some of her commercials, they are “organic moments in Hudson’s eyes,” but she also says she has no problem stopping. . She announced that she would no more Hudson feature in an october Instagram parcel. “I have decided to no longer feature Hudson on Instagram, my TV shows or any social platforms until he is old enough to make this decision for himself,” she wrote.