Other cities – realizing that “the sky doesn’t fall,” as Mr. Shoup put it – followed suit. Some minimum requirements have been reduced, others have eliminated them altogether, and still others go so far as to set a maximum for parking, according to the nonprofit group Parking Reform Networkwas move tracking. Instead of parking, some developers have provided allowance for public transport and use of bicycles or car-sharing agreement.
Reversing the requirements is not the only way parking lots are being renewed. There have been efforts to landscape them with plants to absorb rainfall instead of letting it run off, which can cause flooding. Trees can also hypothermia emanating from the asphalt. Some lots have been converted into parkwhile others are topped with solar panels to provide energy as well as shade.
Not everyone loves reform. WGI’s Mr McConnell said people with disabilities need to be able to park close to where they are going. Most of the time, however, objections to the repeal of the minimum come from homeowners who fear their neighborhood will be flooded with cars.
In South Boston, The quest is increased in 2016. Last year, Miami restore minimum parking requirement. “This is not a city for pedestrians and bicycles,” said one commissioner, complaining about people parking in front of his house.
But momentum is going in a different direction, driven in part by housing lackprompted officials to explore ways to reduce building requirements and make housing more affordable.
In December, San Jose, Calif., become the largest city in the United States to eliminate parking minimums, and Bend, Ore., abolished its minimum this year.
In some cities, the number of parking lots may already exceed demand, according to one inventory 2018 authorized by the American Housing Institute, part of the Mortgage Bankers Association. The survey found that there are 19 parking spaces per household in Des Moines and in Jackson, Wyo., there are 27 parking spaces for every home.
